Samuel D. Schmid

Political Scientist


Curriculum vitae




Comparing Immigration Law: A Quantitative Toolbox


Book chapter


Samuel D. Schmid
This is a forthcoming book chapter in the inaugural edition of the Oxford Handbook of Comparative Immigration Law.

View PDF
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Schmid, S. D. Comparing Immigration Law: A Quantitative Toolbox.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Schmid, Samuel D. “Comparing Immigration Law: A Quantitative Toolbox.” This is a forthcoming book chapter in the inaugural edition of the Oxford Handbook of Comparative Immigration Law. , n.d.


MLA   Click to copy
Schmid, Samuel D. Comparing Immigration Law: A Quantitative Toolbox.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@inbook{samuel-a,
  title = {Comparing Immigration Law: A Quantitative Toolbox},
  series = {This is a forthcoming book chapter in the inaugural edition of the Oxford Handbook of Comparative Immigration Law. },
  author = {Schmid, Samuel D.}
}

In this chapter, I argue that the time is ripe for the interdisciplinary and quantitative study of comparative immigration law based on large-scale data. Written in a way that should be understandable also for scholars and students from other disciplines with little knowledge of political science and quantitative methods, and based on the state of the art in comparative political science, the chapter presents a toolbox of quantitative solutions to the methodological challenges that this enterprise faces. I begin by describing the constituent domains and the architecture of immigration law, and then address the key decisions involved in in devising adequate conceptual tools that clearly specify dimensions of interest for comparative analysis. After a short history of how the field of migration studies has evolved in terms of measurement, the next section explains the two basic approaches to social science measurement and then provides an overview of ten databases and datasets that can be used to quantify dimensions of immigration law. I then move on to tools for descriptive analysis and tools for causal analysis. While descriptive analysis maps variations in immigration law across space and time, causal analysis relies on comparisons that aim either to test causal explanations of variations in immigration law or to estimate causal effects of variations in immigration law on various social and individual-level outcomes. I present the key methodological tools for such analyses by unpacking some pertinent examples from the literature. I conclude by reflecting on the potentials for interdisciplinary cross-fertilizations between empirical legal scholars and quantitative political scientists in the field of comparative immigration law and its advancement through a common research agenda.




Follow this website


You need to create an Owlstown account to follow this website.


Sign up

Already an Owlstown member?

Log in